What is the limit on the use of deadly force in self-defense according to the Texas Penal Code?

The Texas Penal Code provides a clear framework for when the use of deadly force in self-defense is justified. It states that deadly force is permissible when a person reasonably believes that such force is immediately necessary to protect themselves against the unlawful use of deadly force by another person. This aligns with the understanding that deadly force should only be used in response to a perceived imminent threat of serious bodily injury or death.

The rationale behind this standard is to balance the right to self-defense with the need to avoid unnecessary escalation of violence. This reinforces the idea that deadly force is a last resort, only applicable in situations where there is a genuine belief of imminent danger that cannot be averted by less extreme means.

In contrast, other choices suggest broader or less constrained interpretations of when deadly force can be utilized. For example, the idea that it is justified whenever an argument occurs lacks the requirement of an imminent threat of serious harm. Similarly, claiming it can be used whenever someone feels threatened fails to recognize the necessity for an objective reasonable belief of severe danger. Lastly, stating that deadly force should always be the first resort contradicts the principle of using it only when absolutely necessary to prevent serious injury or death.